Your ultimate adoption resource
 

Welcome to our adoption Archive. Have fun browsing!

 

(Browse for more articles)

 

The Sickly State of Public Hospitals

There are many types of hospitals but the Public policy must be written to support
most well known are the Public Hospitals. "safety net" institutions. They must be
What sets them apart is that they provide allowed to organize their own MCOs
services to the indigent (people without (Managed Care Organizations of patients),
means) and to minorities.Historically, to insure patients and to market their
public hospitals started as correction services directly to groups of potential
and welfare centres. They were poorhouses consumers. This way they will save the
run by the church and attached to medical 20% commission that they are paying HMOs
schools. A full cycle ensued: communities currently. If they become more efficient
established their own hospitals which and reduce utilization, they will absorb
were later taken over by regional the full benefits, instead of ceding them
authorities and governments - only to be to contracting groups of patients and
returned to the management of communities insurance companies or even to the
nowadays. Between 1978 and 1995 a 25% government's medical insurance plans. The
decline ensued in the number of public hospitals will thus be able to construct
hospitals and those remaining were their own networks of suppliers and share
transformed to small, rural facilities.In their risks with their physicians or with
the USA, less than one third of the the insurance companies as best suits
hospitals are in cities and only 15% had their objectives.An example: a Public
more than 200 beds. The 100 largest Hospital with its own healthcare plan is
hospitals averaged 581 beds.A debate likely to make use of all its specialists
rages in the West: should healthcare be and facilities, increase capacity
completely privatized - or should a utilization and profits - whereas today
segment of it be left in public only its primary care, less lucrative,
hands?Public hospitals are in dire services are used by independent HMOs.The
financial straits. 65% of the patients do government can limit the total number of
not pay for medical services received by healthcare plans available, so that the
them. The public hospitals have a legal one propagated by the public hospital
obligation to treat all. Some patients will stand out and not be swamped by
are insured by national medical insurance hundreds of other plans. Such a public
plans (such as Medicare/Medicaid in the hospital plan could also be declared the
USA, NHS in Britain). Others are insured "healthcare plan of default" - anyone who
by community plans.The other problem is has not selected a plan will be
that this kind of patients consumes less automatically referred to and included in
or non profitable services. The service the public hospital plan.Not every
mix is flawed: trauma care, drugs, HIV hospital can start an HMO plan. Only the
and obstetrics treatments are prevalent - big ones can support the necessary
long, patently loss making services.The insurance payments, the reserve
more lucrative ones are tackled by requirements and the marketing and
private healthcare providers: hi tech and administrative costs. The paradox is that
specialized services (cardiac surgery, big public hospitals are already
diagnostic imagery).Public hospitals are committed to HMOs, insurers, other
forced to provide "culturally competent patient groups, or government-sponsored
care": social services, child welfare. MCOs. These resist the inclusion of
These are money losing operations from hospitals which own competing healthcare
which private facilities can abstain. plans - in their networks. This is
Based on research, we can safely say that natural: a hospital with a plan - is a
private, for profit hospitals, direct competitor of a private provider
discriminate against publicly insured of healthcare management and insurance.
patients. They prefer young, growing, Another obstacle is that governments are
families and healthier patients. The very reluctant to encourage the public
latter gravitate out of the public sector on account of the private one.
system, leaving it to become an enclave This is definitely out of fashion
of poor, chronically sick patients.This, nowadays.So, an alternative strategy
in turn, makes it difficult for the looks more viable:Public hospitals can
public system to attract human and act as direct contracting networks. They
financial resources. It is becoming more can team up, pool their resources,
and more destitute.Poor people are poor exercise political lobbying, relegate
voters and they make for very little administrative and audit functions (data
political power.Public hospitals operate processing, claim processing, payment
in an hostile environment: budget system, accounting, legal services) to a
reductions, the rapid proliferation of common centre. This will eliminate the
competing healthcare alternatives with a need for middlemen like the HMOs. These
much better image and the fashion of joint networks will be able to negotiate
privatization (even of safety net contracts with other contractors:
institutions).Public hospitals are physicians, pharmacies, specialized
heavily dependent on state funding. laboratories and so on. This will assist
Governments foot the bulk of the the public hospitals to preserve a loyal
healthcare bill. Public and private and stable (low churning) patient
healthcare providers pursue this money. base.Finally, public hospitals are large
In the USA, potential consumers organized employers with political muscle. All they
themselves in Healthcare Maintenance lack is the will to exercise it. They
Organizations (HMOs). The HMO negotiates should do it to force governments to
with providers (=hospitals, clinics, adopt some unpopular decisions: offer
pharmacies) to obtain volume discounts incentives to HMOs which will refer
and the best rates through negotiations. patients to public hospitals, require
Public hospitals - underfunded as they HMOs to use all the range of services
are - are not in the position to offer (both primary and speciality), compensate
them what they want. So, they lose public hospitals directly for nonpaying
patients to private hospitals.But public patients.But the public hospitals must
hospitals are also to blame for their begin to behave as public entities: they
situation.They have not implemented must open their decision making processes
standards of accountability. They make no and make them community-oriented. They
routine statistical measurements of their must shift from relying on contractual
effectiveness and productivity: wait language to relying on administrative law
times, financial reporting and the extent (regulations) - except when it comes to
of network development. As even employment. In a nutshell: they should be
governments are transformed from "dumb business oriented, on the one hand - and
providers" to "smart purchasers", public publicly accountable on the other.There
hospitals must reconfigure, change is the little matter of Public Relations
ownership (privatize, lease their and advocacy. Public Hospitals have a
facilities long term), or perish. terrible image and they are doing very
Currently, these institutions are (often little to change it. They do not even
unjustly) charged with faulty financial collaborate with researchers trying to
management (the fees charged for their establish a factual fundament concerning
services are unrealistically low), "safety net medical and social care". In
substandard, inefficient care, heavy a world where images count more than
labour unionization, bloated bureaucracy realities this may well be the public
and no incentives to improve performance hospitals biggest mistake.Eight Ways to
and productivity. No wonder there is talk Improve the Operation of Public
about abolishing the "brick and mortar" HospitalsA public hospital can lease
infrastructure (=closing the public physical space or temporal slots, or
hospitals) and replacing it with a computer equipment or any other equipment
virtual one (=geographically portable which suffers capacity underutilisation -
medical insurance).To be sure, there are to their physicians for private
counterarguments:The private sector is practice.The lessee physicians will
unwilling and unable to absorb the load undertake to pay the hospital - either in
of patients of the public sector. It is the form of fixed fees or in the form of
not legally obligated to do so and the participation in the income (franchise
marketing arms of the various HMOs are arrangements).They will also commit
interested mainly in the healthiest themselves to provide community-oriented,
patients.These discriminatory practices non profit services in return for the
wreaked havoc and chaos (not to mention right to use what is, essentially,
corruption and irregularities) on the community property.Another method of
communities that phased out the public using the excess capacity is to sell it,
hospitals - and phased in the private rent it, or lease it to entrepreneurs who
ones.True enough, governments perform are not members of the hospital staff.
poorly as cost conscious purchasers of There are many such possibilities: small
medical services. It is also true that laboratories, speciality medical
they lack the resources to reach a services, primary care and specialist
substantial segment of the uninsured practitioners. All these would love to
(through subsidized expansions of use the superior infrastructure of the
insurance plans).40,000,000 people in the hospital. The right to use this
USA have no medical insurance - and a infrastructure can be given in the form
million more are added annually. But, of a concession, a franchise, a rental
there is no data to support the arrangement, or any other arm's length
contention that public hospitals provide mode of collaboration. Professionals are
inferior care at a higher cost - and, likely to jump on the bandwagon when they
indisputably, they possess unique realize that the hospital provides them
experience in caring for low income with a "captive market" of patient. This
populations (both medically and is very much like the relationship
socially).So, in the absence of facts, between an "anchor" in a shopping mall
the arguments really boil down to and the small retail shops surrounding
philosophy. Is healthcare a fundamental it. The small shops benefit from the
human right - or is it a commodity to be business diverted in their direction from
subjected to the invisible hand of the the big "anchor" outlets.The next logical
marketplace? Should prices serve as the step would be to sell products and
mechanism of optimal allocation of services to the community on a
healthcare resources - or are there commercial, competitive basis. The
other, less quantifiable, parameters to hospital does not have to limit itself to
consider?Whatever the philosophical the sale of medical goods and services.
predilection, a reform is a must. It It can also sell medical legal services,
should include the following use its print shop to offer print jobs,
elements:Public hospitals should be organize its social services as a profit
governed by healthcare management experts centre and sell them to the community or
who will emphasize clinical and fiscal to individuals, offer medical consultancy
considerations over political ones. This on a fee per service basis, even sell
should be coupled with the vesting of food from the hospital kitchen through a
authority with hospitals, taking it back catering service or data to researchers
from local government. Hospitals could be from its archives. A natural extension of
organized as (public benefit) this approach would be "internal
corporations with enhanced autonomy to privatization".A hospital is a collection
avoid today's debilitating dual effects: of small (to medium) size businesses
politics and bureaucracy. They could operating under one organizational roof.
organize themselves as Not for Profit Laundry, cleaning, kitchen, the provision
Organizations with independent, self of television sets and telephones to
perpetuating boards of directors.But all patients, a business centre for the
this can come about only with increased hospitalized businessmen - these are all
public accountability and with clear profit or loss generating
measuring, using clear quantitative centres.Internal privatization entails
criteria, of the use of funds dedicated the transformation of the hospital into a
to the public missions of public holding company. This holding company
hospitals. Hospitals could start by will own and operate a host of
revamping their compensation structures corporations. Each corporation will
to increase both pay and financial constitute a separate contractor which
incentives to the staff.Current will provide the hospital with a service
one-fits-all compensation systems deter or a product. Thus, all laundry will be
talented people. Pay must be linked to done by a corporation which will charge
objectively measured criteria. The the hospital for its services. The same
Hospital's top management should receive will go for the kitchen, the printshop,
a bonus when the hospital is accredited the legal services and so on. These
by the state, when wait times are corporations will employ the former staff
improved, when disrollment rates go down of the hospital. This way, the knowledge
and when more services are provided.To and experience accumulated within the
implement this (mainly mental) hospital will not be lost. The
revolution, the management of public corporations owned by the former
hospitals should be trained to use employees will have a "right of first
rigorous financial controls, to improve refusal" in the first five years
customer service, to re-engineer following the transformation. The
processes and to negotiate agreements and employee-owned corporations will be
commercial transactions.The staff must be allowed to match the best offers in
employed through written employment yearly tenders that the hospital will
contracts with clear severance provisions conduct for the services that they are
that will allow the management to take offering.These corporations will also be
commercial risks.Clear goals must be allowed to offer their services to other
defined and met. Public hospitals must clients. Thus, they will reduce their
improve continuity of care, expand dependence on one employer, the hospital.
primary care capacity, reduce lengths of They will become truly entrepreneurial
stay (=increase turnaround) and meet entities, competing for profits in a
budgetary constraints imposed both by the market environment.A part of the
state and by patient groups or their re-engineering process is to determine
insurance companies.All this cannot be which of the functions that the hospital
achieved without the full collaboration fulfils are "core functions",
of the physicians employed by the indispensable functions without which the
hospitals. Hospitals in the USA form hospital will cease to exist or will
business joint ventures with their own change its identity to such an extent
physicians (PHO - Physicians Hospital that it will no longer will be
Organizations). They benefit together recognizable as a hospital. All other,
from the implementation of reforms and by "noncore", functions should be tendered
the increase of productivity. It is out (a concept called "outsourcing").
estimated that productivity today is 40% They should be awarded in a tender to the
less in the public sector than in the most competitive bidders, regardless of
private one. This is a dubious estimate: their identity and previous allegiance.
the patient populations are different The hospital is likely to benefit from
(sicker people in the public sector). But the transfer of functions, in which it
even if the figure is incorrect - the has no relative competitive advantage, to
essence is: public hospitals are less outsiders whose expertise these functions
efficient.They are less efficient because are. This is somewhat akin to
of archaic scheduling of patient-doctor international (free) trade, where each
appointments, laboratory tests and nation optimizes its resources and passes
surgeries, because of obsolete or the (beneficial) results of this
non-existent information systems, because optimization process to its trading
of long turnaround times and because of partners.To control this kind of
redundant lab tests and medical transformation, medical information
procedures. The support - which exists in management systems need to be introduced.
private hospitals - from other (clinical Many are available and they improve both
and nonclinical) personnel is absent the quality and the quantity of data
because of impossibly complex labour available to the management of the
rules and job descriptions imposed by the hospital and, as a result, the decision
unions. Most of the doctors have split making process. This will make it easier
loyalties between the medical schools in for the management to pinpoint which
which they teach and the various hospital areas require doing what. For instance:
affiliates. They would tend to neglect the management of the hospital will be
the voluntary affiliates and contribute able to determine what kind of incentives
more to the prestigious ones. Public should be provided to which members of
hospitals would, therefore, be well the staff, where could costs be cut and
advised to hire new staff, not from where and how could productivity be
medical schools, share risks with its improved.Finally, a novel concept is
physicians through joint ventures, sign emerging. Universities and hospitals are
contracts with pay based on productivity two important repositories of human
and put physicians in the governing knowledge and experience. Virtually every
boards. In general, the hospitals must hospital somehow collaborates with an
shrink and re-engineer the workforce. academic institution, or with a medical
About half the budget is normally spent school.There is symbiosis between
on labour costs in private hospitals - hospital and medical and social
and more than 70% in public ones. It is researchers.Hospitals should actively
no good to reduce the workforce through encourage this. It improves their image,
natural attrition, mass layoffs, or it contributes to their ability to
severance incentives. These are "blind", provide quality services. But should not
nondiscriminating measures which affect do it for free. They should be
the quality of the care provided by the contractual partners to the commercial
hospital. When compounded by work rules, exploitation of the results of research
seniority systems, job title structures conducted within their premises or with
and skewed grievance procedures - the their co-operation. There is a vast field
situation can get completely out of for pharmaceutical, medical, genetic and
hand.The government must contribute its bioengineering research - and a lot of
part. Public hospitals cannot comply or opportunities to make money for the
compete with the demands of national, benefit of the entire community. By not
publicly traded HMOs with political clout getting commercially involved - hospitals
and the capacity to raise capital to give up money which really is not theirs
finance hyper-sophisticated marketing. to give up.




www.ncsap.org keyword stats [2007-05-16-2007-05-16]


Other search phrases:

local authority social services rules for foster children
child death in foster care adoption find parent
domestic adoption agency what keeps children in foster care
law foster child abriter foster family agency
adoptive parents search lutheran family services adoption
support groups for adoptive parents allow homosexuals to adopt children
ohio adoption agency children waiting for adoption in
children needing to be adopted olive crest foster family agency
special needs adoption adopting an aids orphan
statistics of children waiting to be international child adoption agencies
children in foster care for adoption florida foster children
adopt an african orphan single parent adoption china
bill of rights for foster children how to put a child up for adoption





1 - A - B - C - D - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 -