IFRS Adoption: A Necessary Evil

In as unsure of economic times as the onebusinesses and the SEC’s proposed plan in her
we’re living in today, it is only natural for peoplearticle titled “Guessing the Costs of IFRS
to desire some additional consistency and reliability,Conversion”. Sarah states, “In its proposed
principally relating to the business world. In the worldplan to move all U.S. publicly traded companies to the
of accounting these two factors are imperative inglobal standards, the SEC also predicted that the
order for firms to perform daily business operations.largest U.S. registrants that adopt IFRS early would
Due to the ever-changing anatomy of business andincur about $32 million in additional costs for their first
the pull towards globalization companies mustIFRS-prepared annual reports” (Johnson). She
conform to more internationalized standards thanalso makes note of comments made by one of the
ever before. Companies using the current Generallyleading global management consulting companies,
Accepted Accounting Principles in the United StatesAccenture, about their take on the degree of
are being pressed to convert to these internationaldifficulty involved in performing the IFRS conversion
standards set forth by the International Accountingand its comparison to European conversion. In their
Standard Board by 2014. There are, however, somestatement they mention:
encumbrances for many corporations to deal with ifFor one, U.S. companies will have to run GAAP and
they are to transfer over to widely usedIFRS simultaneously under the SEC’s plan and in
International Financial Reporting Standards. Theseorder to meet statutory and regulatory requirements
hindrances may prove to be combative of theoutside the SEC’s purview, such as for filings
potential 2014 mandatory adoption the SEC had setmade with the IRS. In addition, the European
during its meeting in late 2008. As the convergenceexperience is viewed to have been a bit easier
of the United States GAAP and IFRS continues tobecause the countries’ accounting rules were
progress it will ultimately become essential for U.S.fairly similar to the principles-based IFRS, whereas
corporations to fully adopt and administer theseGAAP is considered more rules-based, or prescriptive.
regulations in order to keep up with the world’s(Johnson)
changing economic and business climates.Some supporters counter these higher priced
Much of the reason for the Securities and Exchangeaccusations with the fact that they believe a
Commission to propose a US adoption of IFRS iscompany who does not adapt to international
simply to create a uniform accounting system thatstandards may actually be paying more than one that
can be applied throughout the world. In terms of thehas adapted to the new set of standards.  There is
2014 date set for the adoption by US-basedno doubt that this transition will be an uphill climb but
corporations, it is merely a tentative date and nothingultimate goal is within reach.
definitive is on the agenda at this period in time. In its“There is a clear trend toward adopting IFRS as
document, Roadmap for the Potential Use of Financialthe single body of internationally accepted financial
Statements Prepared in Accordance withreporting standards. In the next few years,
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) bythousands of companies will move to IFRS as a
US Issuers, the SEC set milestones that they willprimary basis of financial reporting” (Gannon).
assess in 2011 in order to establish mandatoryThere are clear and prominent factors that point to
adoption date. These milestones include the following:the fact that transitioning from US GAAP to IFRS,
Achieving sufficient improvements to IFRS, enhancingand including a full blown conversion, is almost now a
the independence, accountability and funding of thenecessity in the United States.  Whether it is directly
IASB and its Trustee Organization, achieving sufficientor indirectly, most US companies are affiliated with
progress on the taxonomy for XBRL compatibility,international firms. “Some [US companies] may be
and sufficient improvement in IFRS education andrequired to adopt IFRS to meet the reporting
training in the US ("IFRS Reporting: Current Situationrequirements of an international parent or investor
and Next Steps").company, while others may recognize the need to
This proposed roadmap has not gone by without itsvoluntarily supplement their current financial reporting
share of criticism, however. In her article thatwith IFRS to allow for an accurate comparison with
highlights the resurgence of the IFRS debate, Mariaforeign competitors” (Gannon). In addition, there
Leone addresses the main concerns that were givenalready have been several efforts to unite the US
briefly after the 2008 SEC meeting by the premierGAAP and IFRS, including IASB’s attempts to
opponents of the IFRS conversion deadline. Theirpublish numerous statements that narrow the gap
apprehensions involving the deadline included thebetween the two accounting standards. Along with
following:these aspects US companies that are subsidiaries or
Training U.S. accountants and auditors by theown subsidiaries in foreign countries may also be
proposed 2014 deadline would be     impossible;required to use IFRS along with their regular
the SEC would cede its regulatory power to a globalstandards. And finally, if a US company maintains
regulator; the standard-setter that wrote the rulesforeign investors it is also likely they would need to
– the International Accounting Standards Boardrelease information according to IFRS.
– would buckle under political pressure; andFrom the pressures of foreign companies to
compared with U.S. generally accepted accountingdomestic inefficiencies the conversion is all but a
principles, IFRS is weak and would therefore invitecertainty. It is just a matter of when and how US
accounting abuse. (Leone)corporations are going to adapt and stay afloat
To go along with the previously mentionedduring this transition period. International Financial
weaknesses is the pure financial aspect of theRecording Standards will soon be uniting the United
conversion. Businesses stand to shell out a significantStates with the rest of the world in creating a new
amount of money in order to transfer over toand integrated system for the business and
international standards during that first year. Sarahaccounting world alike.
Johnson comments on the initial costs of US