Battered Woman Syndrome

Battered woman syndrome attorney staten islandin which prosecutors use the evidence, the evidence's
(BWS) was first proposed in the 1970's and wasrelevance is ostensibly offered to explain why a
essentially based on the clinical observations of abattered woman might change her testimony (i.e.,
single researcher. Nevertheless, the concept quicklycommit perjury) and testify that she was not a
caught on and became a popular way to justifyvictim of battering; in fact, BWS is probably used to
behavior in some courts. However, while it initiallybuttress the prosecution's case by showing prior
enjoyed success in portions of the legal arena, BWSviolent acts by the defendant that would otherwise
has not been established nor accepted in the field ofbe excluded by the rules of evidence.
psychology by serious and rigorous empiricalBWS attorney staten island offers broad
researchers.interpretations of conduct for which there is no
To be sure, clinical syndromes do exist, and BWSempirical support. As courts begin to apply Daubert
may indeed exist, but to date there is insufficientstyled tests of admissibility that query the scientific
empirical evidence to show this syndrome meets thebasis for BWS testimony, they will discover the
rigorous diagnostic criteria of psychology or the law.serious lack of scientific support for BWS. There are
If BWS does exist, there is no reliable means tonumerous non-specific signs that a clinician favorably
identify those who suffer from it from those whobiased towards BWS will "see" in the reports of a
merely claim it as a legal defense.woman relating a history of battering. Such clinicians
BWS appears to be the product of legal advocacyare quick to then label the clinical history as causing
and not science. BWS seems to owe its existence toBWS, and the BWS as justifying or explaining the
the needs of legal attorneys staten island to supportwoman's subsequent unlawful conduct. The clinical
and justify claims by battered women who haveerror or trap lies in the fact that these signs are
killed. Given the lack of an established, empirical,commonly seen in a variety of conditions, and none
scientific basis and its failure to achieve specificare specifically tied to BWS. Further, the patient can
political and social policy goals for women, BWS maysimply lie about or exaggerate their abusive history
not be long for this world.with a host of non-specific signs. There is a human
BWS has been employed in a wide assortment oftendency to accept ready explanations and BWS
cases, ranging from the prototypical self-defenseoffers just that. This unreliable manner leads to
case to the more novel prosecutorial use of theinaccurate diagnosis. A principal tenant of science is
syndrome. In the former set of cases, courts definethere must first be reliability, and absent this, there
the syndrome's relevance variously, from supportingcan be no validity, that is, no trustworthy diagnosis.
the honesty of the woman's belief in the need toSo, how can anyone determine who does and who
use deadly force to her mental incapacity to formdoes not suffer with BWS? The simple answer is, we
the requisite mental intent. In the latter set of cases,cannot.