Adoption - What Can You Believe? Exposing Two Critical Flaws in Adoption Research

I am deeply troubled by what currently passes foryear has not been comprehensively compiled since
research in adoption. View all research in adoption1992. While there are reporting mechanisms for
with a critical eye and look for two serious issues:foster care and international adoptions, states are
POSITIONINGnot legally required to record the number of private,
Positioning: this is a term that comes fromdomestic adoptions."
ethnographic research and asks the question, "What'sThe Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute also
it to you?" In the case of adoption, it means, "Heyinforms us that adoption data is not collected at the
researcher, are you adopted? Are you an adoptivestate level either in the U.S., since this has not been
parent? What's your personal investment in yourmandated since 2001. The next time you read an
research?" Be wary of research in which the authorsarticle about adoption in the U.S. written after 2001
do not specifically state their involvement in adoption.and it states that Americans are only interested in
If left unaddressed, it often means they have noadopting healthy white infants, be aware that there is
personal involvement and thus are not privy to theno reliable data collected at the state or national level
inner workings of adoption. Research like this is rifeto support that assertion. It is merely conjecture.
with holes-questions unasked and opportunities forNothing more than someone's opinion or guess.
discovery missed.WHAT CAN I DO?
Kim Park Nelson, in the book Outsiders Within: WritingIf your cable has gone out and you find yourself, late
on Transracial Adoption (2006) writes, "I am criticalat night, hungry to read adoption research with some
of researchers who do not reveal their personalmeaning, check out the work of:
stake in their research," (p. 90). Kirsten Hoo-Mi Sloth,- Jane Jeong Trenka.
an adult adoptee, echoes this sentiment saying,- Julia Chinyere Oparah.
"...research influences-or should influence-adoption- John Raible.
policy and practice. Research results interpret- Sun Yung Shin.
adoptees' realities. They inform our assumptions- Kirsten Hoo-Mi Sloth.
about what is right and what is wrong inThese authors and researchers are adult adoptees
adoption...We cannot leave this task to nonadoptedand while they will suffer the same dearth of data as
academics alone," (p. 253).all researchers do, at least they can offer us the
LACK OF DATAview from inside the adoption triad. I realize I am
The Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute has beenprivileging the work of adult adoptees. Theirs is an
calling for adoption data to be collected for years.important voice, a voice long unheard in our
Here is what they say about the unavailability ofcommunity. Let us welcome them and listen carefully
national adoption statistics in the United States (fromso that we might better parent our own children.
their website): "The total number of adoptions each